<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criticising Molly? Shut the fuck up.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/criticising-molly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/criticising-molly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/criticising-molly/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 19:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/criticising-molly-shut-the-fuck-up/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>@Marc - interesting you should mention &quot;not having gone xhtml&quot;. The &lt;a href=&quot;/2005/review-dhtml-utopia/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Langridge DHTML book that I reviewed&lt;/a&gt; has a very interesting discussion about html 4.01 strict vs xhtml.

I learned xhtml rather than html, so I find the syntax easier to remember, but don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything advantageous about xhtml that you can&#039;t find in html 4.01 apart from personal preference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marc &#8211; interesting you should mention &#8220;not having gone xhtml&#8221;. The <a href="/2005/review-dhtml-utopia/" rel="nofollow">Langridge DHTML book that I reviewed</a> has a very interesting discussion about html 4.01 strict vs xhtml.</p>
<p>I learned xhtml rather than html, so I find the syntax easier to remember, but don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything advantageous about xhtml that you can&#8217;t find in html 4.01 apart from personal preference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Sherry</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/criticising-molly/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Sherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/criticising-molly-shut-the-fuck-up/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Gotta love those anonymous commenters.  Even better when they&#039;re wrong. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love those anonymous commenters.  Even better when they&#8217;re wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Howell</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/criticising-molly/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 12:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/criticising-molly-shut-the-fuck-up/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Shame &#039;web-standards&#039; don&#039;t extend to standards of decency, taste and chilvaly, doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame &#8216;web-standards&#8217; don&#8217;t extend to standards of decency, taste and chilvaly, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Kirkwood</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/criticising-molly/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Kirkwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 01:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/criticising-molly-shut-the-fuck-up/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I mean, why criticise (&quot;&#039;S&#039; damn you, &#039;S&#039;!&quot; ;) someone for &lt;em&gt;encouraging Microsoft to make their browser better&lt;/em&gt;?! It defies belief... I mean, I&#039;m an avid Firefox user now (but I still haven&#039;t fully &quot;gone XHTML&quot; though; I&#039;m seeing how far HTML 4.01 Strict gets me in the same semantic spirit -- I don&#039;t yet &quot;need&quot; any of the advanced XML-centric features, it seems; and it annoys me when you have to do that bizarre escape sequence for &lt;em&gt;one-off&lt;/em&gt; inline  blocks, etc...), but I&#039;d still glad that IE is finally &quot;moving forward&quot; again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I mean, why criticise (&#8220;&#8216;S&#8217; damn you, &#8216;S&#8217;!&#8221; <img src='http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  someone for <em>encouraging Microsoft to make their browser better</em>?! It defies belief&#8230; I mean, I&#8217;m an avid Firefox user now (but I still haven&#8217;t fully &#8220;gone XHTML&#8221; though; I&#8217;m seeing how far HTML 4.01 Strict gets me in the same semantic spirit &#8212; I don&#8217;t yet &#8220;need&#8221; any of the advanced XML-centric features, it seems; and it annoys me when you have to do that bizarre escape sequence for <em>one-off</em> inline  blocks, etc&#8230;), but I&#8217;d still glad that IE is finally &#8220;moving forward&#8221; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/criticising-molly/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/criticising-molly-shut-the-fuck-up/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>asdfasdf = an American?

*Laughs at Bruce&#039;s counter-comment* Yeah...we (Brits) should be able to spell English words correctly as we did invent the language! (All other versions are a corrupted form!)
*thinks*....Although it is questionable we invented the language because it&#039;s a fusion of all those other languages and dialects poured into one melting-pot. So I should rephrase: &#039;The English language in its entirity originated from our shores so our way of spelling the words is correct in the original version of the language&#039;.

Note: Don&#039;t take any of this seriously... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>asdfasdf = an American?</p>
<p>*Laughs at Bruce&#8217;s counter-comment* Yeah&#8230;we (Brits) should be able to spell English words correctly as we did invent the language! (All other versions are a corrupted form!)<br />
*thinks*&#8230;.Although it is questionable we invented the language because it&#8217;s a fusion of all those other languages and dialects poured into one melting-pot. So I should rephrase: &#8216;The English language in its entirity originated from our shores so our way of spelling the words is correct in the original version of the language&#8217;.</p>
<p>Note: Don&#8217;t take any of this seriously&#8230; <img src='http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/criticising-molly/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 07:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/criticising-molly-shut-the-fuck-up/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=18373&amp;dict=CALD&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;criticise&lt;/a&gt;.   Thanks for your well-researched anonymous comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=18373&#038;dict=CALD" rel="nofollow">criticise</a>.   Thanks for your well-researched anonymous comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

