<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future-proof your CSS with Conditional Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:54:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: :::WebOnTheFly, il blog:::Non compromettere la &#8220;user experience&#8221;:::</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-657867</link>
		<dc:creator>:::WebOnTheFly, il blog:::Non compromettere la &#8220;user experience&#8221;:::</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/#comment-657867</guid>
		<description>[...] per quelli che necessaitano di particolari correzioni. I commenti condizionali sono stati di grande aiuto in questo senso, ma sfruttate anche le vecchie combinazioni di @import e media, che vi permettono [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] per quelli che necessaitano di particolari correzioni. I commenti condizionali sono stati di grande aiuto in questo senso, ma sfruttate anche le vecchie combinazioni di @import e media, che vi permettono [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Lawson’s personal site  : Future-proof your CSS with Conditional Comments</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-626229</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Lawson’s personal site  : Future-proof your CSS with Conditional Comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/#comment-626229</guid>
		<description>[...] Go here to read the rest: Bruce Lawson’s personal site  : Future-proof your CSS with Conditional Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Go here to read the rest: Bruce Lawson’s personal site  : Future-proof your CSS with Conditional Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-276774</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/#comment-276774</guid>
		<description>Goose 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://positioniseverything.net/ie-primer.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Position is everything&lt;/a&gt; have an excellent list of IE&#039;s CSS &quot;quirks&quot;. There&#039;s a good list on &lt;a href=&quot;http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=InternetExplorerWinBugs &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CSS discuss&lt;/a&gt; (the IE7 stuff is obsolete, though; it&#039;s about pre-release versions).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goose<br />
<a href="http://positioniseverything.net/ie-primer.html" rel="nofollow">Position is everything</a> have an excellent list of IE&#8217;s CSS &#8220;quirks&#8221;. There&#8217;s a good list on <a href="http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=InternetExplorerWinBugs " rel="nofollow">CSS discuss</a> (the IE7 stuff is obsolete, though; it&#8217;s about pre-release versions).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goose</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-276726</link>
		<dc:creator>Goose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/#comment-276726</guid>
		<description>I am very impressed that a discussion that with a post in 2005 is STILL active because of MS silliness.. !!!

I have learn&#039;t a lot and I have been doing this stuff for a while and have a times simply resorted to a table so I can get the damm thing up all the while feeling guilty about breaking the accessibility guidelines...

However if there was a definitive list of IE specific CSS screwups (that someone could point me too) that was clearly laid out that I could plan to pick my way around from the outset then i could die a happy web master !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very impressed that a discussion that with a post in 2005 is STILL active because of MS silliness.. !!!</p>
<p>I have learn&#8217;t a lot and I have been doing this stuff for a while and have a times simply resorted to a table so I can get the damm thing up all the while feeling guilty about breaking the accessibility guidelines&#8230;</p>
<p>However if there was a definitive list of IE specific CSS screwups (that someone could point me too) that was clearly laid out that I could plan to pick my way around from the outset then i could die a happy web master !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-214616</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/#comment-214616</guid>
		<description>Hi srini, I&#039;m probably being a bit dense after my holiday, but what&#039;s the advantage of what you propose? (I always dislike !important for browser hackery, as I find it makes the style sheets much harder to debug).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi srini, I&#8217;m probably being a bit dense after my holiday, but what&#8217;s the advantage of what you propose? (I always dislike !important for browser hackery, as I find it makes the style sheets much harder to debug).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srini</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-214009</link>
		<dc:creator>srini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/future-proof-your-css-with-conditional-comments/#comment-214009</guid>
		<description>nice article obviously, well how about using the underscore hack for the min-height and min-width??? 
like

#box { min-height: 100px; height: auto !important; height: 100px; }

instead of

#box {height:100px; overflow:visible;}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article obviously, well how about using the underscore hack for the min-height and min-width???<br />
like</p>
<p>#box { min-height: 100px; height: auto !important; height: 100px; }</p>
<p>instead of</p>
<p>#box {height:100px; overflow:visible;}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
