<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Signs of a sick organisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2006/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2006/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:14:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justus</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2006/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/comment-page-1/#comment-637942</link>
		<dc:creator>Justus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/#comment-637942</guid>
		<description>In sick organizations the managersm do everything alone. Alot of mistrust, too much spying and alot of absenteesm in government organizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In sick organizations the managersm do everything alone. Alot of mistrust, too much spying and alot of absenteesm in government organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sick Boy Fat</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2006/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/comment-page-1/#comment-445797</link>
		<dc:creator>Sick Boy Fat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/#comment-445797</guid>
		<description>It is interesting to note that employees(u) are disheartened, managers rather send email then meet, meetings are actionless in order to avoid confrontation, a sort of psychological ritualistic leading to gradual ineffectiveness of habitual actions. Who is to be held accountable? Does this happen only in entrepreneurial type of organizations? 

Wake up, lets go for a team building game, improve our sales efforts,search for a new job or are you happy wasting your time at this sick company because you are a parasite. That is it my colleagues- we are parasites we milk the company and when it falls sick we sometimes ride it until it dies and then claim we got laid off. 

I think someone said it better if you were so good why did you not set up your own company!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to note that employees(u) are disheartened, managers rather send email then meet, meetings are actionless in order to avoid confrontation, a sort of psychological ritualistic leading to gradual ineffectiveness of habitual actions. Who is to be held accountable? Does this happen only in entrepreneurial type of organizations? </p>
<p>Wake up, lets go for a team building game, improve our sales efforts,search for a new job or are you happy wasting your time at this sick company because you are a parasite. That is it my colleagues- we are parasites we milk the company and when it falls sick we sometimes ride it until it dies and then claim we got laid off. </p>
<p>I think someone said it better if you were so good why did you not set up your own company!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2006/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/comment-page-1/#comment-133053</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 18:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/#comment-133053</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s me told, Carla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s me told, Carla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla Pendergraft</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2006/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/comment-page-1/#comment-133028</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla Pendergraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/#comment-133028</guid>
		<description>If you work for a sick organization, and you have lots of smarts and great ideas, why not show how much guts you have by starting your own company? This, however, would require that you stop complaining. 

I have to say, your use of foul language made it hard for me to appreciate fully what you had to say here. I guess it seems normal to you to use these words? It&#039;s a real turn-off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you work for a sick organization, and you have lots of smarts and great ideas, why not show how much guts you have by starting your own company? This, however, would require that you stop complaining. </p>
<p>I have to say, your use of foul language made it hard for me to appreciate fully what you had to say here. I guess it seems normal to you to use these words? It&#8217;s a real turn-off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Lutchman</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2006/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/comment-page-1/#comment-131845</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Lutchman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 20:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/#comment-131845</guid>
		<description>Hi Bruce
I really enjoyed this publication on signs of a sick organisation. 

The sad reality is that only 20% of managers in the UK are qualified (www.managers.org.uk). How would people think about that statistic if it was about their GP&#039;s or hospital consultant? I don&#039;t suppose they would be too happy. If that situation was true people might refer to doctors in derogatory terms.

Your observations are correct about an anomalous dysfunctional situation in the UK, where so-called managers are by and large plonkers who end up doing administration and ballsing it up. So that leaves people with a nasty impression about what management is about. 

What&#039;s going on in Health Services for example is that you have people being being called managers who couldn&#039;t distinguish an arse from an elbow - yet they want to direct highly skilled and trained staff what to do. Now isn&#039;t that a recipe for balls up and a waste of taxpayer&#039;s money. 

When you meet the odd real and qualified manager it is quite a different experience. I&#039;m not defending anyone here. I just wanted to add a certain context to your accurate observations.

Regards

Russell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bruce<br />
I really enjoyed this publication on signs of a sick organisation. </p>
<p>The sad reality is that only 20% of managers in the UK are qualified (www.managers.org.uk). How would people think about that statistic if it was about their GP&#8217;s or hospital consultant? I don&#8217;t suppose they would be too happy. If that situation was true people might refer to doctors in derogatory terms.</p>
<p>Your observations are correct about an anomalous dysfunctional situation in the UK, where so-called managers are by and large plonkers who end up doing administration and ballsing it up. So that leaves people with a nasty impression about what management is about. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s going on in Health Services for example is that you have people being being called managers who couldn&#8217;t distinguish an arse from an elbow &#8211; yet they want to direct highly skilled and trained staff what to do. Now isn&#8217;t that a recipe for balls up and a waste of taxpayer&#8217;s money. </p>
<p>When you meet the odd real and qualified manager it is quite a different experience. I&#8217;m not defending anyone here. I just wanted to add a certain context to your accurate observations.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Russell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyllis Balls</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2006/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/comment-page-1/#comment-92271</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis Balls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/index.php/2005/signs-of-a-sick-organisation/#comment-92271</guid>
		<description>HR bollocks...

I resigned from a job due to bullying and a schoolground environment.

Human remains said I was free to apply for jobs across the organisation - a well-known newspaper group - and sent me job alerts every two weeks (well, I often had to chase these up).

I applied for jobs, but heard nothing. I sent an email from a work email and, yes, heard back... It materialised that HR was intercepting emails from my home address.

The HR queen claimed she&#039;d only been sending the job alerts as a goodwill gesture, clearly unaware of what a goodwill gesture is.

She should work for Farepak: her goodwill gesture would be supermarket vouchers which no supermarkets acccepted.

And she was negative by the very fact she had nothing positive in mind when sending me these job alerts.

I decided to take civil action. But as the county court claimed it had not received my application, I gave up. What&#039;s the chance of justice if the courts can&#039;t even handle their post...

Recently I applied for an intellectual property (IP law) position at Google. I asked whether I could work on a job share basis, because of my disability. Of course I did not receieve a personal reply, just a generic computerised &quot;you have not been successful&quot;. 

If you look on Google&#039;s own website, you&#039;ll discover it is advertising for a disproportionate amount of HR staff. No mention is made of people with disabilities and whether it operates the two ticks scheme. Well, that&#039;s HR. Two bollocks scheme, perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HR bollocks&#8230;</p>
<p>I resigned from a job due to bullying and a schoolground environment.</p>
<p>Human remains said I was free to apply for jobs across the organisation &#8211; a well-known newspaper group &#8211; and sent me job alerts every two weeks (well, I often had to chase these up).</p>
<p>I applied for jobs, but heard nothing. I sent an email from a work email and, yes, heard back&#8230; It materialised that HR was intercepting emails from my home address.</p>
<p>The HR queen claimed she&#8217;d only been sending the job alerts as a goodwill gesture, clearly unaware of what a goodwill gesture is.</p>
<p>She should work for Farepak: her goodwill gesture would be supermarket vouchers which no supermarkets acccepted.</p>
<p>And she was negative by the very fact she had nothing positive in mind when sending me these job alerts.</p>
<p>I decided to take civil action. But as the county court claimed it had not received my application, I gave up. What&#8217;s the chance of justice if the courts can&#8217;t even handle their post&#8230;</p>
<p>Recently I applied for an intellectual property (IP law) position at Google. I asked whether I could work on a job share basis, because of my disability. Of course I did not receieve a personal reply, just a generic computerised &#8220;you have not been successful&#8221;. </p>
<p>If you look on Google&#8217;s own website, you&#8217;ll discover it is advertising for a disproportionate amount of HR staff. No mention is made of people with disabilities and whether it operates the two ticks scheme. Well, that&#8217;s HR. Two bollocks scheme, perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

