<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Google OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/on-google-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/on-google-os/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kozakewich</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/on-google-os/comment-page-1/#comment-618359</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kozakewich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1842#comment-618359</guid>
		<description>The great thing about operating systems is that you can have a few on one system, and then switch between depending on the circumstance. Need a quick boot to check an email? Press the power button, boot into Chrome OS, and start email.
Otherwise, start whatever else.

It does sound like a really good idea. After using Chrome for a while, it&#039;s just really hard to go back to the other slower browsers. Firefox takes over eight seconds to start, which really chafes at me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great thing about operating systems is that you can have a few on one system, and then switch between depending on the circumstance. Need a quick boot to check an email? Press the power button, boot into Chrome OS, and start email.<br />
Otherwise, start whatever else.</p>
<p>It does sound like a really good idea. After using Chrome for a while, it&#8217;s just really hard to go back to the other slower browsers. Firefox takes over eight seconds to start, which really chafes at me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/on-google-os/comment-page-1/#comment-617738</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1842#comment-617738</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s Linux based (which I assume it is), then we should at least see great enhancement of drivers and such for the rest of the Linux world.

I&#039;m not ready to give Google more business though, they have control over so much public and private information on the web and that&#039;s a little too much power for my liking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s Linux based (which I assume it is), then we should at least see great enhancement of drivers and such for the rest of the Linux world.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not ready to give Google more business though, they have control over so much public and private information on the web and that&#8217;s a little too much power for my liking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Weems</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/on-google-os/comment-page-1/#comment-617735</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Weems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1842#comment-617735</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ll admit I didn&#039;t see this coming this soon, but I did expect something like this to happen eventually.

I think naming it identically to their browser will be a tad confusing, but other than that I like the idea of another free operating system choice (especially one with Google&#039;s level of resources behind keeping it maintained).

I did think about the browser/OS same-vendor issue myself, but as they&#039;re not a monopoly yet and the OS is free, I guess it&#039;s not really a problem for now.

In five to ten years if Google&#039;s suddenly dominating the browser market and the OS market, then at that point we can grab some pitchforks and make angry noises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ll admit I didn&#8217;t see this coming this soon, but I did expect something like this to happen eventually.</p>
<p>I think naming it identically to their browser will be a tad confusing, but other than that I like the idea of another free operating system choice (especially one with Google&#8217;s level of resources behind keeping it maintained).</p>
<p>I did think about the browser/OS same-vendor issue myself, but as they&#8217;re not a monopoly yet and the OS is free, I guess it&#8217;s not really a problem for now.</p>
<p>In five to ten years if Google&#8217;s suddenly dominating the browser market and the OS market, then at that point we can grab some pitchforks and make angry noises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoteTheDay</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/on-google-os/comment-page-1/#comment-617716</link>
		<dc:creator>VoteTheDay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1842#comment-617716</guid>
		<description>We invite everybody to speculate on the outcome of the battle &#039;Google Chrome OS-Windows&#039;. Is Google going to knock Microsoft down? Or Windows will never be defeated as the most popular OS? Tell us - http://www.votetheday.com/software/google-chrome-os-kills-windows-431/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We invite everybody to speculate on the outcome of the battle &#8216;Google Chrome OS-Windows&#8217;. Is Google going to knock Microsoft down? Or Windows will never be defeated as the most popular OS? Tell us &#8211; <a href="http://www.votetheday.com/software/google-chrome-os-kills-windows-431/" rel="nofollow">http://www.votetheday.com/software/google-chrome-os-kills-windows-431/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/on-google-os/comment-page-1/#comment-617714</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1842#comment-617714</guid>
		<description>@Chris_Hunt:

Microsoft was already in a monopoly position with its Windows OS when they were criticized about making Internet Explorer an integral part of the Operating System (which to the layman user, meant that he/she would never even think of trying other web-browsers, thus the anti-competition argument). Besides, IE&#039;s lack of standard compliance was well-documented, and its vulnerability / numerous security holes were a clear incentive for the industry regulators to intervene in order to enable competition.

As far as I know, Google-OS is not in a monopoly position, right ? :) Furthermore, it&#039;s going to be open-sourced for the most part, and support for other browsers will be ensured.

Google Corp. understands freenomics probably better than any other competitor, and they may well be the next monopoly in a new era of cloud computing. We shall see. For now, their contribution to open knowledge and open-source software undeniably benefits the world, which until very recently is not something that could be said about Microsoft.

I for one am looking forward to playing with Google&#039;s Linux-based OS. It won&#039;t replace my main Mac OS X machine but it should provide an interesting small form-factor / mobile computing experience. Let&#039;s hope that Google get hardware manufacturers to adopt Mary Lou&#039;s / Pixel Qi outdoor-friendly energy-saving LCD displays !! :)

Cheers, Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris_Hunt:</p>
<p>Microsoft was already in a monopoly position with its Windows OS when they were criticized about making Internet Explorer an integral part of the Operating System (which to the layman user, meant that he/she would never even think of trying other web-browsers, thus the anti-competition argument). Besides, IE&#8217;s lack of standard compliance was well-documented, and its vulnerability / numerous security holes were a clear incentive for the industry regulators to intervene in order to enable competition.</p>
<p>As far as I know, Google-OS is not in a monopoly position, right ? <img src='http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Furthermore, it&#8217;s going to be open-sourced for the most part, and support for other browsers will be ensured.</p>
<p>Google Corp. understands freenomics probably better than any other competitor, and they may well be the next monopoly in a new era of cloud computing. We shall see. For now, their contribution to open knowledge and open-source software undeniably benefits the world, which until very recently is not something that could be said about Microsoft.</p>
<p>I for one am looking forward to playing with Google&#8217;s Linux-based OS. It won&#8217;t replace my main Mac OS X machine but it should provide an interesting small form-factor / mobile computing experience. Let&#8217;s hope that Google get hardware manufacturers to adopt Mary Lou&#8217;s / Pixel Qi outdoor-friendly energy-saving LCD displays !! <img src='http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers, Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heilmann</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/on-google-os/comment-page-1/#comment-617713</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heilmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1842#comment-617713</guid>
		<description>@remy this is nothing new. Homesite was a core of C and most of the tool itself was done and extendable with JScript. 

You can even script Illustrator with JavaScript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@remy this is nothing new. Homesite was a core of C and most of the tool itself was done and extendable with JScript. </p>
<p>You can even script Illustrator with JavaScript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

