<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This millenium in HTML 5 (politics)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/this-millenium-in-html-5-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/this-millenium-in-html-5-politics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:08:26 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on some new HTML5 elements &#8212; Nicolas Gallagher — Blog &#38; Ephemera</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/this-millenium-in-html-5-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-633672</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on some new HTML5 elements &#8212; Nicolas Gallagher — Blog &#38; Ephemera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1979#comment-633672</guid>
		<description>[...] Bruce Lawson has similar concerns and proposes another alternative &#8212; removing the need for a wrapping element and defining a new element specifically for marking up subtitles: I agree that hgroup is clumsy and likely to be misused. Rather than wrap an h1 and its h2 subtitle in hgroup to keep the subtitle out of the outlining algorithm, I would prefer to use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bruce Lawson has similar concerns and proposes another alternative &mdash; removing the need for a wrapping element and defining a new element specifically for marking up subtitles: I agree that hgroup is clumsy and likely to be misused. Rather than wrap an h1 and its h2 subtitle in hgroup to keep the subtitle out of the outlining algorithm, I would prefer to use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/this-millenium-in-html-5-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-631752</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1979#comment-631752</guid>
		<description>Great article, Bruce. I agree, I&#039;d rather use heading tags rather than hgroup, personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Bruce. I agree, I&#8217;d rather use heading tags rather than hgroup, personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david hausdorff</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/this-millenium-in-html-5-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-631641</link>
		<dc:creator>david hausdorff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1979#comment-631641</guid>
		<description>VERY informative article. I’m really enjoying your ‘how to blog series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VERY informative article. I’m really enjoying your ‘how to blog series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Design - standards based web design, development and training &#187; Some links for light reading (8/9/09)</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/this-millenium-in-html-5-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-631537</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Design - standards based web design, development and training &#187; Some links for light reading (8/9/09)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1979#comment-631537</guid>
		<description>[...] This millenium in HTML 5 (politics) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This millenium in HTML 5 (politics) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kozakewich</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/this-millenium-in-html-5-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-631498</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kozakewich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1979#comment-631498</guid>
		<description>This is probably the best recap so far.

I&#039;ve noticed that there&#039;ll be nothing special, but then someone will happen to mention a list of things they&#039;re thinking about, someone will talk more in depth on one or two of those points, and then everyone will start disagreeing on one thing or another.
Suddenly, you&#039;ve got this polarized debate over a single item on someone&#039;s list. You can almost guess when it&#039;s going to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably the best recap so far.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that there&#8217;ll be nothing special, but then someone will happen to mention a list of things they&#8217;re thinking about, someone will talk more in depth on one or two of those points, and then everyone will start disagreeing on one thing or another.<br />
Suddenly, you&#8217;ve got this polarized debate over a single item on someone&#8217;s list. You can almost guess when it&#8217;s going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/this-millenium-in-html-5-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-631419</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/?p=1979#comment-631419</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t realise that my elements would be taken literally:

The spec recommends that every header element is at the beginning of some piece of sectioning content, with every header being a &#039;h1&#039;. So, how about a simple element &#039;h&#039;, with numbering automatically determined by the level of nesting.

The sectioning element can then act as a &#039;hgroup&#039;, with only the first &#039;h&#039; appearing in the outline and any others represent subheadings not to be in the outline.

It&#039;s backwards compatible as only &#039;h&#039; will use this new logic, and h1,h2,… can be as they were. And you can have more than 6 levels of headings (not that you’d need to).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t realise that my elements would be taken literally:</p>
<p>The spec recommends that every header element is at the beginning of some piece of sectioning content, with every header being a &#8216;h1&#8242;. So, how about a simple element &#8216;h&#8217;, with numbering automatically determined by the level of nesting.</p>
<p>The sectioning element can then act as a &#8216;hgroup&#8217;, with only the first &#8216;h&#8217; appearing in the outline and any others represent subheadings not to be in the outline.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s backwards compatible as only &#8216;h&#8217; will use this new logic, and h1,h2,… can be as they were. And you can have more than 6 levels of headings (not that you’d need to).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
