Gene spent 15 years at Microsoft, managing antitrust compliance with American and European orders and decrees, so he knows what he’s talking about when he writes
In its 10K in a section entitled “Our Future Opportunity”, Microsoft made the following admission, which, to anyone that has advised a dominant firm on compliance and communication to minimize problems with competition laws, was truly shocking.
“Leveraging Windows to fuel our cloud business, grow our share of the PC market, and drive increased engagement with our services like Microsoft Edge, Bing, Copilot, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft 365 Consumer, XBOX Game Pass, and more.”
Not grow Windows, not improve the product, not lower the price, but simply leverage its dominant operating system platform to advantage and grow share for other products. Besides the smoking-gun nature of such a statement in a world where self-preferencing by dominant platforms is effectively being outlawed, it reflects an expressed intent to use its significant market power in Windows, not to make Windows better for its customers, but instead to coerce and cajole its customers into using other more strategic Microsoft products.
To people in IT of a certain age (like me), “10K” sounds like the amount of storage you’d require for a really banging ZX Spectrum or BBC Micro game, or if you’re younger, 1% of the size of a hero image from a dull stock photography site. But actually it’s an annual report required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, that includes information such as company history, organisational structure, executive compensation, equity, subsidiaries, audited financial statements, and similar excitement.
To those of us not in the world of economics or anti-trust fun, the word “leverage” just seems like one of those Ha Ha Business! buzzwords that simply means “to use” (as in, “let’s leverage the boss’ golf trophy to break up that floater so it will flush”).
But what does the word “leverage” mean in this context? Because I’m thick (but well-connected) I emailed Gene to ask. If he rolled his eyes and tutted, I didn’t see, and he graciously allowed me to quote his reply:
It’s kind of one of those magic words in antitrust law that can reveal the intent behind conduct that could be interpreted more than one way. Courts and regulators tend to be very deferential to unilateral business decisions of monopolists if there is any even plausible argument that they are “pro-competitive” or “competition on the merits”.
This statement (especially because it is in a securities filing) can’t be dismissed as just the rantings of a random employee in an email or presentation. It’s the considered position of the company (If it’s not, they have misled investors). And the “leveraging” language is especially problematic as it essentially admits two key elements of an abuse of dominance claim:
1. That they have something (market power/dominant position) to leverage; and
2. That they intend to unfairly use that position for advantage in adjacent markets.
It’s a very interesting divergence between what they teach in business school and what competition laws might prohibit. There is nothing “pro competitive” about “leveraging” a dominant position for unfair advantage. Even monopolists are allowed to compete vigorously “on the merits” (i.e. price, improving quality, etc). But it can be an abuse of dominance to leverage a dominant position in Europe and elsewhere.
In the US, the law is more deferential… and tends to allow even “leveraging” a monopoly, unless that either protects the existing monopoly or might tend to create a new one… And interestingly, Microsoft’s statement arguably breaches even that generous allowance by saying they will leverage to ”increase share of the PC market.”
A dominant company is generally allowed to say “We have a successful product, and we’re going to use it to sell our other products”. The legal question is whether the means by which the dominant position is leveraged are capable of harming competition, rather than simply whether Microsoft obtains benefits from Windows.
I’ve written before about Microsoft’s dirty tricks in UK. Since then, Mozilla’s Over The Edge 2 report assessed Microsoft’s tactics across four regions: the USA, India, the UK, and EU (Germany), and concluded
Microsoft still does not allow users to download, set as the default, or keep using alternative browsers without harmful interference. The patterns are documented, and they meet established definitions of coercion, deception, and manipulation.
These tactics, even the milder ones within the EU, harm Edge’s competitors (as well as users, whose choice isn’t respected). And, to add insult to injury, Microsoft thumbs its nose at regulators by crowing about it in its annual filing.
We will examine Microsoft’s provision of a range of business software products used by UK organisations, including productivity software, personal computer and server operating systems, database management systems and security software.
We will consider whether practices such as bundling products, limiting interoperability, or using default settings make it harder for customers to switch providers and reduce competition from rivals.
In today’s digital-first workplace, the browser has quietly become the new operating system for enterprise productivity. From accessing SaaS platforms and cloud-native applications to enabling real-time collaboration and now AI-assisted workflows, the browser is no longer just a window to the web—it is the primary interface for getting work done.
With our mission to be the best browser for business, we are harnessing the power of AI to help you and your organization to stay on the cutting edge. Microsoft Edge continues to be your copilot for the web—the first to integrate AI-powered search, and the only one with Bing built-in.
The Microsoft Edge sidebar lets users access productivity tools side-by-side with their browsing window. In this release, the sidebar is enhanced to increase productivity and improve user experience.
The browser has quietly become the universal workspace. What started as a simple tool for accessing the internet has transformed into the central hub for enterprise productivity, collaboration, and now—AI-powered workflows. From cloud applications and SaaS platforms to GenAI copilots running inside browser tabs, the browser is where work is increasingly happening.
It seems obvious to me that Microsoft is abusing its dominance on Windows to harm competitor browsers, and is brazen enough to openly admit it in a legal document to the Priests of US Magic Capitalism. Microsoft management are basically pulling a moonie at competition regulators.
It’s time for competition regulators in the UK and the EU to stop it.
Browser Choice Alliance (a coalition of browsers dedicated to the principle that users should have the right to use their browser of choice on Windows devices)
The Goldilocks customizable select height – ” I realised there’s a sizing ‘pattern’ that’s almost always the-one-you-want, but it took me a long time to figure out how to do it in CSS” writes Web Standards hunk Jank Architect
County With 37 Data Centers Asks Schools to ‘Conserve Electricity’ – “Henrico County is a major hub for data centers in Virginia. Its officials said it expects a 25% rise in electricity costs next year, and advised workers to close the blinds and turn off their computers to make up for it.”
US Supreme Court just blew up EU-US Data Transfers– “US Supreme Court decided the US Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) may not be independent anymore. Since 2000, the EU has relied on the “independent” FTC as the enforcer of EU-US deals on personal data. According to EU treaty law, such oversight must be independent. In the current EU-US deal, the European Commission relies on the independent FTC 259 (!) times”.
NFC access on iOS – CMA call for evidence – “We are continuing to work on the full design of any potential intervention to ensure fair and reasonable NFC access on iOS”
Google and Apple’s Anti-DMA Lobbying Strategy Goes All-in on Security and Privacy – As the EU starts to press Big Tech to open their operating systems to competitors’ services, you’ll hear a lot more handwringing from them about privacy and security. Most is FUD. Look at their record for privacy and security, especially of their own single-platform (“native”) apps and app stores.
The Slow Death of the Power User – “This is the result of two decades of deliberate, calculated effort by the largest technology companies on earth to turn users into consumers, instruments into appliances, and technical literacy into a niche hobby for weirdos.”
How AI reduces the world to stereotypes – Rest of World analyzed 3,000 AI images (“an Indian person,” “a house in Mexico,” “a plate of Nigerian food”, etc) to see how image generators visualize different countries and cultures.
I was excited to see the great showing for Chromium here, especially in Speedometer, which is widely seen as the most representative real-world responsiveness benchmark.
So, just for fun, I figured I’d try some stiffer competition: Can Chromium on my iPhone 17 Pro Max (A19 Pro) beat Safari on an iPad Pro (M5)? I wandered into a local Apple store to re-run the Speedometer test. It’s closer, but my iPhone’s lead holds. I think this might make my iPhone the world record holder for Speedometer score on an iOS device?
Now Microsoft engineers have documented a performance tax – the performance hit that iOS users today endure because Apple requires iOS browsers, with theoretical exceptions, to use the WebKit browser engine that powers Safari.
The performance tax comes to 28.6 percent, almost as much as Apple’s 30 percent commission rate.
Speedometer is a test suite primarily developed by Apple, results of which it has used in regulatory filings to claim users don’t need and/or wouldn’t benefit from real browser competition.
It’s notable that this is a prototype, without any attempts to make it fast. Also, there are many outstanding bugs in BrowserEngineKit, the middleware that Apple requires other browser engines to use.
In response to Kyle’s post, the Principal Engineer at Chrome, Rick Byers, wrote
Given how Chromium and WebKit are always vying for the top spot in Speedometer on MacOS, it’s really striking how big the gap is on iOS! And we haven’t even really tried to optimize performance for that platform yet! IMHO this is what you should expect to see when there’s a lack of competition!
…But you can’t have it.
Even if the Apple bugs were fixed and optimisations were completed, you are not allowed to have this much faster iOS browser. This is solely because of Apple’s self-preferencing rules: either the ridiculously anti-competitive Web Browser Engine Entitlement (in EU and Japan) or Rule 2.5.6 (“Apps that browse the web must use the appropriate WebKit framework and WebKit JavaScript”) elsewhere.
Overall, we have not to date seen clear evidence that the WebKit restriction improves privacy on iOS devices.
…the Webkit restriction limits the ability for browser vendors to innovate and differentiate themselves from Safari, including on privacy. Different stakeholders appear to interpret privacy differently, compared to security, in relation to which there is more alignment across stakeholders.
On security, too, the CMA found Apple’s claims to be weak:
Overall, we have not yet seen clear evidence that the WebKit restriction confers a significant improvement in security compared to a situation where other browser engines would be allowed on iOS. The WebKit restriction may create security benefits for Apple devices (albeit these could be potentially extended, at least to some extent, to rival browser engines), through enabling closer integration between WebKit and device hardware, and providing Apple with greater control over browser engines such that it can ensure browsers use an up-to-date browser engine and do not implement features that may create a security risk. However, as explained in Section 3 above, the restriction limits the ability for browser vendors to improve their browsers and differentiate themselves from Safari, including on security.
Evidence also indicates that all the major browser engines take a stringent approach to testing for and fixing security vulnerabilities. Apple’s submissions that it is the only browser engine developer that could be trusted to perform this function on iOS therefore seems weak.
Apple’s claims for WebKit’s superior speed, privacy and security don’t stand up to scrutiny. It’s time for the regulators to strike down Apple’s restrictive terms and conditions, and compel Cupertino to fix BrowserEngineKit, so we can have genuine competition on iOS. Apple customers deserve a browser that’s genuinely blazing fast, private and secure.
“Me, in hotpants, shaking the golden-clad BrucieBooty™ to a song based on ‘In the Navy’ by Village People”, I suggested to our head of marketing. He muttered something under his breath and left the room.
But now he’s on paternity leave, so here it is: “In Vivaldi”. Big love to New Andre for adding karaoke lyrics, and La Daughter’s Squeeze for backup dancing.
Apple designed its wonderful new (fast! private! thinking of the children!) Siri AI in a way that it knew contravened the EU Digital Markets Act. It expected the EU to let it break the law anyway, pinky-promising that it would make it compliant after 18 months. Understandably sceptical, after 2 years continued WebKit monopoly on iOS, EU said “no”. Not-Steve and Not-Steve-Either are both Very Sad (while still Thinking Of the Children).
Unfortunately, due to the Digital Markets Act (DMA), Apple will not be able to ship Siri AI in the European Union with the release of iOS 27 and iPadOS 27. Over the past several months, EU regulators did not accept any of Apple’s proposed solutions to bring Siri AI to the EU while safely supporting other virtual assistants.
sobbed Craig Federighi, Apple’s senior vice president of Software Engineering, lachrymosely. Dabbing his eyes and blowing his nose, Crying Craig blamed “EU regulators’ extreme interpretation of the DMA” which outrageously requires Apple to, er… obey legislation.
The decision not to roll out Siri AI in the EU is Apple’s and Apple’s only. Absolutely nothing in the DMA prohibits Apple from introducing new products in the EU. What Apple is, however, not allowed to do is to close the market. It’s not for them to choose which AI tools our EU citizens get to use or not. That’s not an option.
Because it would mean that no AI agent other than Siri AI, by the way, powered by Google, would have an equal chance to be chosen by iPhone users. Apple was simply unable to develop interoperability solutions that meet essential EU privacy and security standards.
And more importantly, and I will finish with this, EU law is non-negotiable.
Doubtless, Apple is preparing to leave EU and take their toys home, as they threatened 9 months ago. As a Brexit Benefit, the UK will be a huge marketplace for contraband devices with hallucinating robots protecting your Comfort and Security. And (of course) Thinking Of The Children.
Our towns will be filled with grief-stricken Europeans begging “S’il vous plaît, vendez-moi juste un téléphone fruité?“, “Hast du so ein bescheuertes Handy, das mir 30 % meines Geldes abknöpft?“, “Alstublieft, één apparaatje waarmee ik aan de kinderen kan denken!” or “¡Dame fruta robot brillante, hombre!”
Siri AI and the other new Apple Intelligence features will not be available in China while Apple works through regulatory requirements.
But that’s to be expected; China is always the exception, even when it comes to Apple’s “deep sense of responsibility to make technology for people that respects their human rights [and] empowers them with useful tools and information”.
It’s almost as if Apple fights regulators if it thinks it can continue making monopoly profit that way, but kowtows to authoritarians elsewhere if that’s where the money is.
Ad infinitum – “Google didn’t talk about ads in the I/O keynote. Everything they announced is the new ad system. One that, in the eyes of Google, no longer needs the open web as an intermediary … Google is betting its entire future on a world where people eagerly hand over their emails, their files, their habits, and their trust – to an AI system that will quietly auction off their attention, word by word, to the highest bidder.”
Six Characters – What the PNR locator on your boarding pass actually contains, and why the fare calculation line on your e-ticket is written in a currency that does not exist.
How sheep and solar power work together at the Volkswagen Chattanooga factory – “Adaptive grazing with sheep is an efficient and cost-effective way to control vegetation and minimize erosion risks on utility scale solar facilities … To help keep the sheep safe, Silicon Ranch Corp. employs “guard” donkeys to alert the sheep of any threatening wildlife.”
Last week the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) launched its strategic market status investigation into Microsoft’s business software ecosystem. An investigation doesn’t necessarily imply that Microsoft has done anything wrong; it will examine Microsoft’s position in the markets and decide whether it is powerful enough to require “action to promote customer choice”.
This is A Good Thing. Doubtless vendors of video conferencing, email clients, and clown computing will have their own stories to tell of Microsoft’s self-preferencing, but I’m in the browser business, so here’s mine.
Three years ago the CEO of Vivaldi (my boss) wrote an open letter to the EU Commission expressing concerns over Microsoft’s anti-competitive practices. And since I joined Vivaldi in 2024, I’ve been working with other Windows browser vendors in the Browser Choice Alliance, making press and regulators aware of Microsoft’s dark patterns and deceptive practices.
We’ve managed to shame Microsoft into making some changes in the EU, although Microsoft Edge is still not designated a ‘Core Platform Service’ (CPS), so remains exempt from special obligations. (It was originally designated, but Microsoft appealed and it was un-designated [PDF] because “Edge’s scale of usage in the web browser CPS category is low” and “Microsoft’s ability to use Edge as a lever to drive usage of other Microsoft services is at present limited”.)
But, of course, the UK is no longer a member of the EU, so Microsoft continues to misbehave on this scepter’d isle. For example, Windows doesn’t respect the user’s chosen default browser when you do a search from the Windows Bottom Taskbar Thingy™. Here’s a video made Monday 18 May at 12.16pm, four minutes after a Windows update on a UK region Windows 11 machine, with Vivaldi set as the default web browser:
The important thing to note is that Windows starts Microsoft Edge when you initiate a search in Windows Bottom Taskbar Thingy™. It’s self-preferencing and this behaviour cannot be over-ridden (although you can override Bing as the default search in Edge).
Once upon a time you could use EdgeDeflector, a small application that intercepted URIs that force-open web links in Microsoft Edge and instead redirected it to the system’s default web browser (if you knew the utility existed, and knew how to get code from Github, and were allowed to install it on a corporate machine) but Microsoft sabotaged that.
Why does Microsoft make Windows do this? As with a shark or a werewolf, I can only speculate about the Beast Of Redmond’s primal urges, but every user that can be shown Bing search results is a chance to show more ads, and make more money. And, perhaps just as important to Microsoft, it’s money that’s not going to Google.
Now that “A.I.” is being pushed deeply into all Microsoft products, it is a great chance to get users away from Google’s Gemini and into Copilot – which will show you personalised ads and use your private data for training the next iteration of its LLM soothsayer.
If you don’t want ads to be personalized, simply adjust your ad settings … When you share information with Copilot it benefits your and others’ experiences by helping Copilot understand trending topics and common questions. You can always opt out.
Which means that unless you take evasive action, you’re being snooped on by default. You’re tracked in the browser; what you do in the search engine is spied on, and anything you let Copilot see is training data.
Fun fact: a lot of people pronounce Microsoft’s sparkling autocomplete as “Co-Pilot”, but it’s actually pronounced “Copy-Lot”. That’s because Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI (“a division bringing together our major consumer AI products including Copilot, Bing, GroupMe, MSN and Edge”) believes
With respect to content that is already on the open web, the social contract of that content since the ’90s has been that it is fair use. Anyone can copy it, recreate with it, reproduce with it. That has been freeware, if you like.
Personally I don’t like. But they copy, lots. Hence the name.
Our Edge browser has taken share for 20 consecutive quarters, and Bing monthly active users reached 1 billion for the first time
As with other Big Tech wannabe monopolists, if dirty tricks work while regulators turn a blind eye, Microsoft has no reason to stop. In fact, it has millions of green-backed reasons to continue using its market dominance to restrict competition.
As always, the CMA are eager to hear opinions of UK businesses, or organisations that have customers in the UK. You can be as brief as you like (i.e., you don’t need to have an opinion on every facet of Microsoft’s software) and can remain anonymous. Comments close midnight on 4 June.
A Transformational Narrative for Stakeholders, Team Members, Ecosystem Participants, and Value-Adjoining Strategic Humans
At BruceLab, we believe the future is not merely arriving. It is onboarding itself asynchronously into an AI-enabled value stream.
Over the last several quarters, we have engaged in a deep-listening exercise with the market, our customers, shareholders, executive thought partners, and selected prompts inside GPT-4 Enterprise. Through this journey of intentional operational becoming, one thing has become radically clear:
The future of software engineering is no longer about writing software. It is about orchestrating outcomes across a dynamic intelligence fabric.
This is why today we are excited to announce the next chapter of BruceLab's transformational evolution:
BruceLab Act 2.1: Operationalizing Excellence Through AI-Native Human Capital Rationalization
This initiative positions BruceLab at the convergence of:
AI-first stakeholder enablement
decentralized decision acceleration
machine-scale ideation throughput
synergistic platformization
and people-adjacent innovation verticals
In practical terms, this means we will be:
reducing organizational drag coefficients
sunsetting legacy human workflows
flattening management topology surfaces
and empowering leaner, higher-bandwidth micro-teams to execute with founder energy
Some roles may transition into alumni status as part of this exciting optimization journey.
We do not view this as downsizing.
We view it as: Strategic Talent Realignment for the Agentic Era™
Our 12 Pillars of AI-Native Executional Velocity
After an intensive offsite facilitated by McKinsey, three keynote speakers from NVIDIA, and an AI-generated mural experience, we identified the twelve immutable truths of next-generation software delivery
1. Software will no longer be built by developers
Software will be manifested through probabilistic orchestration pipelines facilitated by context-aware autonomous digital entities.
Developers will continue adding value in areas where humans still temporarily outperform systems.
2. Every workflow is an AI workflow
If a process cannot be automated, it should at minimum become a dashboard.
3. Meetings are now deliverables
Going forward, all meetings under 30 minutes will be classified as “micro-sprints.”
4. Middle management is latency
By reducing management layers, we reduce conversational packet loss and increase accountability throughput.
5. Humans should focus on uniquely human activities
Examples include:
narrative amplification
trust signaling
strategic empathy
conference attendance
and re-prompting agents after failed outputs
6. AI agents are teammates
All agents will receive BruceLab handles and participate in retrospectives.
(Agents exceeding performance expectations may receive expanded token budgets.)
7. Every employee must maintain a prompt portfolio
Beginning Q3, performance reviews will include:
Prompt Quality Index (PQI)
AI Utilization Rate (AIUR)
Hallucination Recovery Velocity (HRV)
and Net Strategic Alignment Per Utterance (NSAPU)
8. Documentation is now self-healing
Documentation accuracy will be maintained through recursive AI summarization loops.
9. Code ownership is obsolete
In the future-state enterprise, code owns itself.
10. Customers crave autonomous experiences
Research indicates enterprise buyers increasingly prefer phrases like:
“AI-powered”
“agentic”
“self-optimizing”
and “governance-aware”
regardless of implementation specifics.
11. Burnout is a resilience opportunity
Team members are encouraged to leverage wellness synergies and growth mindset modalities during periods of accelerated transformation.
12. The future belongs to companies brave enough to say “agentic” 400 times
We intend to lead.
Operating Principles for the New Era
We are retiring our previous values framework and replacing it with a more execution-oriented system:
Speed with Optional Quality
Perfect is the enemy of shareholder value.
Radical Accountability
Every team member is now effectively a startup founder without corresponding equity implications.
Customer Obsession
We remain deeply committed to listening to customers before confidently ignoring their requests in favor of our AI roadmap.
Organizational Enhancements
To unlock maximal strategic agility:
teams will now consist of two humans and approximately eleven AI agents
all approvals will be replaced with confidence scoring
Jira tickets will be automatically generated, closed, reopened, reprioritized, and emotionally categorized by LLMs
several countries may be deprecated
PowerPoint usage will increase by 700%
Additionally, we are proud to launch:
BruceLab Duo Ultra Max Enterprise Infinity
This next-generation platform layer leverages:
multimodal orchestration matrices
autonomous DevSecFinOps observability
contextual token-efficient governance abstraction
and quantum-ready semantic pipeline harmonization
Pricing will combine:
subscriptions
consumption billing
surge pricing
and “outcome-aligned monetization moments”
Fervently Avoided Questions (FAQs)
Is this a layoff?
We prefer the term:
“Workforce topology modernization.”
Will AI replace engineers?
No. Engineers will continue playing a critical role in supervising AI systems until confidence thresholds improve materially.
Why does this document read like it was generated by AI?
We reject the premise of the question.
However, this communication was proudly co-created through a human-AI strategic storytelling partnership leveraging frontier narrative tooling.
Some paragraphs appear duplicated.
This is intentional redundancy for alignment reinforcement.
Some paragraphs appear duplicated.
This is intentional redundancy for alignment reinforcement.
Why are there random capitalization inconsistencies?
This is part of our new Dynamic Tone Authenticity initiative.
Final Thoughts
BruceLab is no longer simply a DevSecOps platform company.
We are becoming:
an intelligence coordination layer,
a software cognition substrate,
and a stakeholder-centric orchestration ecosystem for the post-human productivity frontier.
The future will belong to organizations capable of:
moving fast,
leveraging AI,
flattening hierarchies,
and generating visionary keynote decks containing glowing purple gradients.
We are excited for this next chapter. Next Act. Whatevs.
Please do not reply directly to this announcement thread because comments have been disabled for alignment purposes.
This reading list is courtesy of Vivaldi browser, who pay me decent money to fight for a better web and don’t moan at me for reading all this stuff. We’ve just released Vivaldi 7.9, with even more personalistion and zero “A.I.”, because it’s cream of the crop, not a stream of the Slop.
The end of responsive images – As another perp behind the ungainly responsive images syntax, I too feel Matttt Marquis’ pain, and say yay sizes=”auto” for lazyloaded images.
Roving Tabindex – A simple dependency-free HTML web component that implements the roving tabindex pattern for building accessible menus and grids
Talking of which… Google’s Prompt API – No web standard should require you to agree to an advertising company’s “terms of use”, says glamorous Matttt Marquis.
Under the hood of MDN’s new frontend – in which it is revealed that using React to serve essentially static content “accumulated quite a lot of technical debt”, and is better replaced by … Web Components and CSS, AKA “the web platform”. And also the revolutionary new concept of “Shipping only what’s required”.
How Many Bites at the Apple? – Gene Burrus, who headed up Microsoft legal after the landmark IE browser monopoly case, writes “Apple has again asked the Supreme Court in the United States to excuse its engagement in unfair methods of competition and contempt of court”
On Tuesday, the European Parliament presented the statutory review of the Digital Markets Act. So, naturally, I went to Strasbourg to tell politicians that as DMA has only really been in force for two years, it’s probably too early to make any amendments. And while it’s been quite successful so far, we really need the Commission to enforce it more vigorously. (Many MEPs agree; last week, the European Parliament’s Internal Market (IMCO) committee called for the “full and proactive use” of all the Digital Market Act tools, and encourage the EU to resist external political pressure.)
As an independent European browser, Vivaldi needs access to platform controlled by vendors of competing browsers. It’s ridiculous that Apple is still able to impose impossible conditions on anyone who wishes to use their preferred browser engines on i(Pad)OS, and that Microsoft is still able to self-preference its own Edge browser on Windows.
If Europe is to achieve real digital sovereignty, the EU needs to monitor compliance -not just believe the Gatekeepers marking their own homework- and have the courage to impose real sanctions against Big Tech’s attempts to smother European compeititors.
I arrived the evening before my meeting, so had a while to look around Strasbourg, which was pretty.
And while Strazzy is (currently) in France, it has a heartily Germanic side to its cuisine. My dinner comprised most of a pig cooked in beer, and about a kilo of roasted potatoes (plus a salad and some bread):
The European Parliament was cool, and it made me sad that the UK is no longer included. Whatever the British Right may think of the European Project, Europe hasn’t forgotten the contribution that Britain made to ensuring a democratic Europe.
Let’s hope Europe is courageous against modern fascists and their industrialist friends as it was 80 years ago.
